Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Dubno

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as it passes WP:GNG per consensus. (non-admin closure) Hocus00 (talk) 04:30, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Dubno[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG CeltJungleSnake (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CeltJungleSnake (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:28, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:28, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Covered in many reliable websites including [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] and many more. He should pass for WP:GNG. Edamdual (talk) 15:32, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are plenty of independent reliable sources that cover the subject in depth. It's an obvious keep. Easily passes WP:GNG. Less Unless (talk) 20:53, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Edamdual above. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Edamdual. Powerful Karma (talk) 08:53, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.